Integral indicator of the effectiveness of radio-controlled munition countermeasure systems on armoured and automotive vehicles of security and defence forces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33405/2786-8613/2025/2/6/350764

Keywords:

state security, security mechanism, armoured and automotive vehicles, counter-reconnaissance protection, radio-controlled munitions countermeasures, unmanned aerial vehicles, detection, coefficient, monitoring, radio-technical visibility, effectiveness enhancement, integral indicator, normalised criterion, Euclidean metric

Abstract

The article proposes a methodological framework for evaluating the effectiveness of radio-controlled explosive device (RCED) neutralization systems — a critical component of the security apparatus of the National Guard of Ukraine (NGU) units. The purpose of the research is to develop a formal mathematical model which enables a comparative assessment of various technical and organizational-technical protection solutions using a comprehensive set of criteria that includes both combat performance and cost-effectiveness. The tasks addressed include: (1) identifying key technical, tactical-operational, informational-analytical, command, personnel training, economic, standardization, and reliability indicators as constituents of the integral effectiveness index; (2) formalizing normalization, weighting, and aggregation procedures of the indicators; (3) proposing a formula for the cost-efficiency ratio “effectiveness/costs”; (4) defining a procedure to filter out ineffective solutions; (5) constructing a resource-allocation model across different equipment variants and life-cycle stages under budget constraints; (6) demonstrating the calculation of integral and specific effectiveness indices on exemplary alternatives; (7) justifying decision-making logic for financing prioritization; (8) showing the model’s flexibility for adaptation to changing threat and resource conditions; (9) evaluating the practical feasibility of the model for military implementation.
As research methods, the study applies multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, normalization and weighting procedures, construction of integral and cost-efficiency indices, and illustrative simulation calculations. The results demonstrate that the proposed model enables quantitative comparison of different protection systems and supports informed decision-making about modernization, procurement, or decommissioning. A concrete numerical example shows that a system with the highest absolute effectiveness may have a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than a cheaper alternative pability.
The proposed methodology is suitable for strategic planning within the security and defense sector, budget allocation for armament and special equipment, risk assessment, and adaptive resource management for NGU units.

References

Roszkowska, E. (2025). Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Katowice: University of Economics in Katowice. Retrieved from: http://www.mcdm.ue.katowice.pl (accessed 19 September 2025) [in English].

Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y., Hwang, C. L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 76, iss. 3, pp. 486–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8 [in English].

Madanchian, M. (2020). A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method. Semantic Scholar. Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org (accessed 19 September 2025) [in English].

Malefaki, S. (2020). Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods and Normalization Techniques. Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111863 [in English].

Normalization Techniques for MCDM: A comparative study. (2019). ResearchGate. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334267234 (accessed 15 September 2025) [in English].

Headquarters Department of the Army. (2009). FM 3-36. Electronic Warfare in Operations. Washington, DC. 180 p. [in English].

Headquarters Department of the Army. (2017). FM 3-12. Cyberspace and Electronic Warfare Operations. Washington, DC. 210 p. [in English].

NATO Allied Tactical Publication (ATP 3-36 / FM 3-36). (2010). Electronic Warfare. Bonn: BITS. Retrieved from: https://www.bits.de (accessed 15 September 2025) [in English].

Headquarters Department of the Army. (2009). FM 3-36. Electronic Warfare in Operations. Early edition. Washington, DC. 170 p. Retrieved from: https://www.bits.de (accessed 19 September 2025) [in English].

NATO Standardization Agreement. (2014). AECTP-500 / STANAG 4370. Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Tests and Verification. Bonn: IB-Lenhardt AG. Retrieved from: https://www.ib-lenhardt.com (accessed 03 September 2025) [in English].

Pesci, M. E. (2018). Controlled IED Electronic Warfare (CREW) testing methodology. Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory. Laurel, MD. Retrieved from: https://www.jhuapl.edu (accessed 10 September 2025) [in English].

IntelMarketResearch. (2022). Vehicle bomb jamming systems overview. IntelMarketResearch Blog. Retrieved from: https://www.intelmarketresearch.com (accessed 28 September 2025) [in English].

NATO. (2023). Electromagnetic warfare. NATO Official Topic Page. Brussels: NATO. Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int (accessed 19 September 2025) [in English].

Counteroffensive Pro. (2025). Ukraine countermeasures vs Shahed threats. Counteroffensive News Analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.counteroffensive.pro (accessed 12 September 2025) [in English].

Social Science Research Network. (2021). Security Aspects of IEDs. Retrieved from: https://www.socialscienceresearch.org (accessed 23 September 2025) [in English].

Sakovych, V. I., Lopatin, O. V. (2021). Methods of expert evaluation in military research: theory, practice, models. Kyiv: NUOU named after I. Cherniakhovskyi. 184 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kravchuk, S. V., Bondarenko, P. P. (2020). Methods for assessing the effectiveness of electronic warfare equipment and EW systems in a multispectral environment. Kharkiv: KhNUPS. 212 p. [in Ukrainian].

Milanovic, J., Petrović, D., Kovač, M. (2023). Multispectral Detection of Armored Vehicles under Battlefield Conditions: Models, Metrics and Counter-Measures. Defense Technology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1121–1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2023.02.014 [in English].

Published

2026-01-29

Issue

Section

Статті